
It seems as though someone doesn’t realize just how much he reveals about his motives.

It seems as though someone doesn’t realize just how much he reveals about his motives.

Let’s say you do something for the seven times and fail. On the eighth try, while attempting to convince the authority you’ve “learned from your mistakes”, you still make the same mistake.
Some might call that a pattern.

In Schmalfeldt v. Grady, et al, the Plaintiff says in Count II that all the defendants are part of a larger conspiracy because.. well..

Yesterday, I made a post about Schmalfeldt lying related to navigating the website of the VA. He claimed that not only did someone file a false report about fraud, or someone filed a report about and he’d be told later.. no wait, he was trying to get into the VA website and his account was suspended and he needed bank information but his access to the bank was suspended and he couldn’t get his money, and that’s how he found out about the fraud.. no wait……

I have been reading Schmalfeldt’s ridiculously crafted “Memorandum of Law” in his opposition to the motions filed by Attorney Louis Nettles on behalf of the defendants. In it, Schmalfeldt makes this statement in support of his contention that jurisdiction is prudent in his .. um.. lolsuit..

Seems as though a certain someone trying to make fun of another individual, sorta ran into large field of rakes.

A certain someone is projecting on the twitterz again about how miserable an adversary is based on absolutely no evidence whatsoever Continue reading