Violating Twitter TOS (not really) because..

macaca_nigra_self-portrait_custom-a8e13582c9ca6f71f5cd62815b8bb5d6ff112dc2-s300-c85It seems as though a certain individual has this idea that because something wasn’t explicitly said, doesn’t make it true.

Let’s say you’re in a court case and the court publishes a routine order that conforms to existing precedent – for example, say, hypothetically, a pro-se plaintiff is given a Roseboro Order. Continue reading →