This week’s theme: It’s all in gray.
Rule 5: Monday Shades of Gray
8
Monthly Archives: August 2017
Sunday Blessings
This weeks blessings are courtesy of the strangers who pay it forward.
A young woman was at the cash register in the grocery store with her two children and forgot her wallet. As she was fumbling to find her wallet, she was saying how she wasn’t sure she would be able to get home because she also needed gas. Continue reading
Fun Fact of the Day
The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously under U.S. customs regulations, the tomato should be classified as a vegetable rather than a fruit.
Your tomato enjoys the legal status of a vegetable.
Rule 5: Sunday Denim
Team Ginger..
Throwing ice into the cold water
In Schmalfeldt’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Make More Definite in Schmalfeldt v. Grady, et al, he makes a rather interesting argument in defense of his complaint. Continue reading
Fun Fact of the Day
From the Efficiency in Government Department:
The World Bank is an organization of 10,000-plus employees whose mission is the eradication of poverty. One element of what they do is writing policy reports about how to make the world better.
About 31 percent of all reports put online by the World Bank have never been downloaded by anyone in the world.
Rule 5: Saturday Denim
Getting some weekend refreshments..
With apologies to Quentin Tarantino
Chapter 11:
The Failure and Bigotry of Bill
It can never be said that a racist, bigoted, or misogynist slur was too obscene for Bill Schmalfeldt.
Here we go again..
For a guy living as a transient in a South Carolina extended stay motel with Stage 9125151 Parkinson’s Disease, Bill Schmalfeldt seems to think he carries weight and power on the internet.
Well, he does carry a lot of weight, but not a lot of power to move it.
Hey! Don’t remove my impertinent and scandalous words!
In Schmalfeldt’s incorrectly titled “PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MAKE MORE DEFINITE AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM FOR WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED” response, he makes the following argument:
II. There is No Compelling Reason to Strike Any Portion of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint Due to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Oh really? Continue reading
Sonoran Conservative 