Throwing ice into the cold water

1032

In Schmalfeldt’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Make More Definite in Schmalfeldt v. Grady, et al, he makes a rather interesting argument in defense of his complaint.

The Defendants’ motion states the following:

These Defendants request that the Plaintiff be required to give dates and places for the allegations in Paragraphs 4, 5, 9, 15, 16,19, 23, 28, 30, and 39. Without this information these Defendants and the Court cannot properly determine the application of the South Carolina Long-Arm Statute to this Complaint.

And his response:

III. The Defendants Are Attempting to Throw Cold Water on Plaintiff’s Argument for Specific Personal Jurisdiction by Focusing on Allegations Made for Actions Taken Against Plaintiff Before He Moved to South Carolina in April 2017

Oh, this is going to be good.

im-going-let-you-think-about-one-minute-sip

He starts out stating with the following in paragraph 1:

In Paragraph 9 of the SAC, Plaintiff alleges “(a)ll four defendants have remarked on Plaintiff’s difficulty in finding a permanent residence since moving to South Carolina in April 2017.”

And to support that statement he adds comments made by the defendants’ ..

.. wait..

… are you sitting down, because I don’t want you to fall over and hurt yourself from laughing too hard…

(ahem)

He adds quotes from the various blogs that were made AFTER he filed the initial suit. No really, he’s adding MORE RECENT allegations of butthurt into his opposition.

4a2e68e0813de0788848dab6c3443c12

And he even pulls one from the blog of yours truly:

On July 18, on a blog by Marvin J. Rodriguez, Defendant Grady wrote:3

Well, after I email-blasted EVERY LANDLORD IN THE ENTIRE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (no, really – there’s a list) and reminded them that STEP 1 of any background check is RUN A CREDIT REPORT on any prospective tenant, that general advice has apparently guaranteed that a guy with two moves in 6 months and a pending lawsuit in Maryland is going to get the brush off.

So why in the world would he think to add those in, even though it’s improper?

I’m SO GLAD YOU ASKED!  He is more than willing to share his amazing legal acumen.

2. Paragraphs 15, 16, 19, 23, 28 and 30 have less to do with establishing Specific Personal Jurisdiction in South Carolina than they do with establishing a pattern of conduct leading to the Defendants’ tortious acts after Plaintiff moved to South Carolina.

Let me see if I understand this:  He admits the paragraphs in the complaint were not about establishing specifics, nor to satisfy jurisdiction, but rather to show a pattern of behavior and improperly adding more alleged comments helps that?

giphy8

Um, ok. So what is to be gained from this?  Oh yeah, he spells out his trial strategy:

3. When Plaintiffs case is presented to a jury, not only will the jury hear about the harm they have caused to Plaintiff by their specific, manifestly intended targeting of their defamatory comments to the forum state, Plaintiff plans to introduce evidence of defamation and other alleged torts going back to late 2015. All this Court needs to do is take a look at any of the three mentioned blogs and the comments inserted after each post to see the scurrilous and scandalous accusations made against the Plaintiff, not only since his move to South Carolina, but before.

In other words, your Honor, go to these defendants blogs, read the comments and let me have my trial.

uhy

And to top it all off, he makes this statement:

4. There are other potential defendants who may well be permissively joined to this suit as it progresses, if it is allowed to progress as justice demands.

In other words, I have more people that have caused me massive butthurt and I really need to get this going so I can add them to the suit.

In essence, he has more than ice cubes to worry about for this ship…

 

13 thoughts on “Throwing ice into the cold water

    • Another way to look at this:

      He is in South Carolina and is using state claims in a federal suit. However, he cannot provide a single instance of where any specific actions by the defendants’ in South Carolina has caused him harm.

      And yet, he wants to litigate all the past butthurt, which is really his legal theory that the reason he can’t get a residence is from all the defendants’ past behavior even though he falls well short of the FRCP requirements.

      In other words, he wants the court to give him the justice he wants without playing by the rules.

      Liked by 3 people

  1. This is both appalling, and amusing. But mostly really sad. This man has absolutely no life. I’ve heard that folks should have a hobby., but what he’s doing is nowhere near having one.
    I thought he was dying? What happened to that?
    This is such a train wreck, and I can’t look away.
    Does anyone have anymore popcorn 🍿?

    Liked by 5 people

    • You would think if you moved to another state to start a new life with your future bride you would focus on getting a place to live and get settled in before tackling a huge project like a federal lawsuit.

      If he informed a landlord he was on a reliably decent fixed income and willing to have his payments debited from his bank account his social security checks are deposited in he would have a place already. Landlords love renters paying through debited accounts and on fixed incomes. It wouldn’t be a great property but a place to live and build a life. If he was smart he wouldn’t be looking for properties in a city but in the country where rent would be cheaper.

      They’re too busy resisting and he is too busy writing motions instead of pounding the pavement. A felon with a job and poor credit would’ve found a place already.

      Liked by 7 people

    • That’s seems to be the size of it. And he and Kimby have the unmitigated gall to call John a vexatious litigant.

      Projection, thy name is dumbfuck leftist.

      Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s