And there are liberals. Which one is worse?
I didn’t realize the Commander-In-Chief required anyone’s approval to make changes to military exercises.
And even if he did, it’s just joint exercises and not a strategic military change.
But, you know Obama convinced Iran to get rid of it’s nukes and got paid a few billion dollars in cash.. wait..
Sonoran Conservative 
And here I thought the department of defense answered to the civilians? Huh. This liberal proves it again: he couldn’t run a lemonade stand without misunderstanding the point or the purpose!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Maybe Axelrod would like to enlighten us as to who ordered a stand down of Marine reaction forces for the Benghazi consulate on Sept 11, 2012 since he is such a F’ing expert on consultation with the military chain of command.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Axelrod would love to tell you who that was, but he was fired anyway so shut up, racist.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wait, this is a trick question, isn’t it?
LikeLiked by 3 people
EMBRACE TEH POWAH!!!!!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
You want more Trump?
This is how you get more Trump…
LikeLiked by 4 people
Well, Axelrod is so used to running everything by Valerie Jarrett that by force of habit he just assumes the President would be deferring all decision-making to somebody. I’m a little surprised he thinks that would be Mattis, though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
On reflection, running everything by Mathis is not the *worst* idea…
LikeLiked by 4 people
If it was Pence or Haley in the big chair, that would be almost required. Not that the SecDef ought to have a Jarrett-style veto, just that his advice would be more important.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Axelrod is just another human analog suited only for testing the terminal performance of hand loads.
LikeLiked by 1 person