Schmalfeldt is off on the Twitterz again talking about his case being “Rock Solid”, the Court has ruled already on “Failure to state a claim” and that all of the defendants have contacts in South Carolina that establish jurisdiction.
I would like to respond to all of these assertions just briefly. (Apologies if this takes a bit to load…)
https://twitter.com/breitbitnews/status/882027863372951559
https://twitter.com/breitbitnews/status/882032863574720513
https://twitter.com/breitbitnews/status/882016281725153280
OK, if you say so.
Update: Forgot one.
Sonoran Conservative 
They shall choose option (C). Whip Schmalballz’ bloated ass in court again until Free Willy turns tail and bails to another state.
But thanks for playing, Dumbfuck.
LikeLiked by 4 people
He should have stopped after he typed “IANAL”.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Maybe he should have typed I R ANAL. Juat sayin’.
LikeLiked by 3 people
“I❤ANAL” – William M. “Bill” Schmalfeldt, Sr.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I’m really curious about “all with direct, professional connections to South Carolina.”
Because he [REDACTED] in his FAC (fatal flaw alert!).
LikeLiked by 4 people
“I’m in South Carolina. I got a letter from him in a legal action. Therefore, he has direct professional connections to South Carolina and satisfies jurisdiction.”
Do I have to do it again?
LikeLiked by 3 people
How is that true for all for defendants?
(rhetorical question)
LikeLiked by 2 people
whereis that quote from? I’m missing valuable lulzy content here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you look at the third tweet above, you will see it is a reply to a tweet where he says envelopes are enough to establish venue and jurisdiction.
No, really. He made that tweet.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I am totally stealing a copy of that monkey picture.
LikeLiked by 3 people