A matter in the case of Hoge vs Kimberlin, et al. (updated)

Posted on by

A June 28th Show Cause hearing for violating court rules by recording a hearing without express permission is coming.

TICK TOCK..

TICK TOCK..

TICK TOCK..

j9k4mje

Update:

Shot –

https://twitter.com/breitbitnews/status/877958042246987780

 

Chaser –

https://twitter.com/breitbitnews/status/877358984247652352

 

Everything is proceeding as I (and so many others) have foreseen.

20 thoughts on “A matter in the case of Hoge vs Kimberlin, et al. (updated)”

  3. Take it “seriously.”

    Let’s give credit where it is due. Witless cannot get beyond a MTD, but he keeps trying to be Perry Mason. That is true “persistence.”

    It is, however, ridiculous that anyone else should view his suits at law as serious. We remember when he tried to sue under Wisconsin law for a tort not recognized by that state and when he tried to sue civilly under a criminal statute.

    For some reason, it seems to infuriate him that others are not terrified by his “persistence” at failure.

    Liked by 4 people

    Reply ↓

  5. Sometimes it’s necessary to remind the general populace that there are certain specimens of subhumanity placed among us for no other good purpose but to serve as examples of WHAT NOT TO DO.

    So when Bill Schmalfeldt tells you to take this shit seriously, BET THE OTHER WAY.

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply ↓

  6. MJ, to be fair to Bill the two situations are different. Bill has no future to look out for. Just existing in his one room hole in the wall, waiting for his government check and tilting at windmills on the web.

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply ↓

  8. I’ve been a named defendant in a previous lolsuit, along with many others. That was when he ‘learned’ what he ‘knows’ about resolving the federal diversity question. For some reason, he’s decided that (accidentally) clearing that hurdle is the hard part, so he ‘learned’ not to sue people he hasn’t doxxed. He also thinks the whole thing will be terribly expensive for everyone except him. Hint: Nope. Blobbert, you have no case. Anyone at least as smart as you (ie: EVERYONE) could write a winning MTD in their fucking SLEEP because no one has defamed you, or your boyfriend Rauhauser. Defame is not a synonym for insult. No one has harassed you, or Peggy Pinkie Pie, because no one has contacted you after being asked to not contact you. When you have to go looking for it, especially on sites where you’re banned, it cannot be harassment. No one has committed any actual tort against you, Chubs, and your only chance of lwgal victory is exactly the same as your Pedobomber hero: default. None of us is going to allow you that, the way whatshisname did for Kimberwhine.

    Liked by 5 people

    Reply ↓

  9. Pingback: Top 5 Posts of Year | Sonoran Conservative

Leave a comment