There are so many from the liberal side, but this one is hilarious.
Well, except for the fact that the victim alleges acts against her specifically by name. If the assailant denies those acts, which he did, and he denies ever being at such a party where those acts took place, does it mean he implicated himself?
But, it gets dumber ..
It’s one thing if you’re not a witness to an event at a party. It’s another if you’re being accused of getting someone pregnant. To suggest denying being at a party without a location or date imputes guilt is nothing more than grasping at straws.
Logic is not something liberals are good at. Ever.