You know, the axiom “if your opponent is busy making mistakes, don’t interrupt” applies here.
As I understand it, the burden of proof is on our friend, Bill. Truth is an absolute defense for libel, and it’s on my side. He is the subject of the truth.
Remember, this is a guy who doesn’t understand jurisdiction so it goes without saying that he lacks basic understanding of legal principles. It’s more than just filing as a pro-se plaintiff with a questionable IFP application .
Speaking of jurisdiction, here is his response to Pablo’s comment:
From my perspective, Pablo just baited him into confirming he doesn’t understand jurisdiction.