Better have a seat.
Bill Schmalfeldt is all about holding people accountable for libel. Libel is bad. Very bad. You could easily get sued for it, even if there is no libel. Bill just has to smell it and wham! US Marshal’s are Murum Aries Attigat’ing your front door.
Unless, of course, he libels. Then you’re a racist for pointing it out. So here is my bigoted report about small town libel from a loathsome white liberal man.
He posts this tweet:
https://twitter.com/TrumpThumpRadio/status/927707007272083456
Patrick Grady never drove to Clinton, Iowa, and slashed Schmalfeldt’s tires There is more than sufficient proof to support Grady’s alibi. He didn’t even have slovenian horse poop in his car.
Schmalfeldt’s tires did blow out as seen in these photos:
Notice the date and time of the pictures: April 1, 2017 at around 12:05 pm.
Later that evening, he states he had a text conversation with someone he believed was Grady. Even though the other person did not admit to being Grady, Schmalfeldt said it was him because of this:
Bill Schmalfeldt loves to stalk people. He has published people’s houses that come from Google View while trying to doxx them. You know what else Google View can show? Surrounding buildings. In fact, it can show the entire town, including establishments and their addresses. You can even see the reviews of the local dining establishments and watering holes at the same time!
We do know the texts come from the person running the “Thinking Man’s Zombie” site here. Read it. Stretch your lulz muscles.
Here is the police report filed the next day, April 2, 2017 at around 9:49 am.
Notice that after the investigation was completed, the disposition was changed to “Inactive/Suspended”. After consultation with the Clinton, Iowa, police department, no suspects were identified no one was arrested.
However, Schmalfeldt made this tweet the day before the police stopped the investigation:
Did Grady admit to vandalism and say Hoge made him do it to the Police? Or is Schmalfeldt lying? At a minimum, Schmalfeldt said the police told him Grady and Hoge admitted to committing a crime! And if the police didn’t say that to Schmalfeldt, and Schmalfeldt is saying they did, does that constitute recklessness and malice?
Libel, anyone? Anyone?
Under Schmalfeldt’s legal theory for his own Federal case as to what constitutes defamation, Schmalfeldt is not expressing an opinion; he is asserting a false fact.
I quote from his Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants Motions (Schmalfeldt v. Grady, et al)
“Plaintiff has only one interest in the writings of the Defendants – that the things they write about Plaintiff be provably true or clearly stated as opinion. Even in the arena of opinions, one cannot disguise a defamatory statement merely by claiming it is an-opinion. “Pure Opinions” are opinions that cannot be proven true or false by objective measures. One cannot legally create “proof’ of something that did not happen.“
His recent tweet would be a cause of action, at a minimum, that should have him thrown in handcuffs to make a most unpleasant appearance before a certain Chief Pro-Se Prosecutor Judge of Twitter court.
When the police did not buy his story, Schmalfeldt decided to try another approach.
Schmalfeldt was being sued by Hoge for defamation and for violating a settlement agreement. Schmalfeldt filed a motion for a show cause hearing in that case on why Hoge shouldn’t be held in contempt for inciting violence, and supplied the pictures of the tires and police report shown above.
To support his theory, he went on to share over 100 pages of exhibits of blog posts and comments, well over a year old to give the Judge a backstory that “supposedly” supports his claims
The Judge denied his motion. He probably had to have lulz muscles checked out.
And if the Judge granted the motion, it would have been interesting to see if Schmalfeldt would have driven the 1000 miles with his new tires to Westminster, Maryland, Parkinson’s and all.
But.. you know what they say:
LikeLiked by 2 people
Um this is the same Bill Schmalfeldt who tweeted that I was “spilling the bad about Grady” ( a man I never head of until the creeper drew me into his drama) and claimed that my sister was talking to him. Yeah that LIAR!!
LikeLiked by 5 people
Oops, spilling the beans
LikeLiked by 2 people
One of the things that Schmalfeldt has stated in the past is that he believes telling “lies” will get people to talk. He claims this is accepted practice as an investigative reporter, and as a police officer.
Setting aside for the moment that Schmalfeldt thinks that impersonating a police officer is a good thing, his tactics do not represent “journalism” but rather harassment. In my case, in order to get my identity, he tried to associate me with a convicted child molester and then tried to pass it off as good journalism.
Funny how someone like him makes those kinds of claims, but has never been recognized as a good journalist. Unless you’re Brett Kimberlin.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yeah, having the good will of a violent domestic terrorist, drug smuggler, forger and perjurer is very informative to the subject’s character.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You left out pedophile.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What is really funny is how Fail Whale thinks repeating the things HE HIMSELF SAYS is defamatory and libel.
if that were true, then wouldn’t he shutting the hell up stop it?
it would definitely slow down the PLM, that is for sure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
All of these crybullies think exposing their owns word is defamatory
LikeLiked by 2 people
Isn’t impersonating law enforcement a crime?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, and so is using the Seal of the President of the United States and impersonating a Federal Officer. One those, “Boss sets the example” kind of things.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bill thinks its okay to impersonate a cop. That is expected as he has impersonated a journalist (very badly I might add) for quite some time now.
LikeLiked by 1 person