Apparently, if you are the victim of a stalker, and you do not provide the stalker with your correct address on your Restraining/No Contact Order, you are violating the stalker’s Constitutional Rights.
Sarah Palmer got a restraining order against Bill Schmalfeldt for his harassment back in early 2016. Now he wants her address and is upset she isn’t living where she is SUPPOSED to live.
In trying to serve her for his vexatious LOL suit, he decided to harass her again. Only this time, he wants to call the police on her because he says it’s “perjury” since she didn’t use her real address when she filed the petition.
Of course, anyone who has ever obtained a restraining order knows that the address of the victim may be altered/removed from the copy the stalker gets.
But not Schmalfeldt. He seems to think he has a right to know where his victim is.
I cannot tell you how stupid this man is. There doesn’t seem to be a bottom for his stupid hole.
Here is what Bill said when he called the clerk about the restraining order. Seriously, the man is a deranged cyberstalker.
Huh. Let me see if I understand this: The law allows for a different address on an RO so that the victim is protected and you’re saying that’s illegal?
Well, he did it, I guess. The stalker actually sent stalking evidence to the police about Sarah Palmer’s alleged perjury.
I kid you not.