Question for Audience Participation Posted on June 30, 2017 by Sonoran Conservative Oh, I think you know you want to help this guy out. I’ll start: Having a case. Keep it going. Share this: Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Like Loading... Related
Being able to show up in court. That appears to be a problem for this particular plaintiff. LikeLiked by 7 people Reply ↓
Learning the rules of the court? I don’t think that’s too much education, since he’s already heard it from one judge. LikeLiked by 4 people Reply ↓
Rules only apply when he’s the Judge. That’s why he wins all the time on Twitter Court. LikeLiked by 3 people Reply ↓
Actually making it past the Motion to Dismiss stage…to boldly go where no Schmalballz has gone before…at least as a plaintiff… LikeLiked by 5 people Reply ↓
Actual torts would help a civil case. Being the resident of the state you’re suing in, at the time you allege the torts happened, would help. Not being a pissant and suing because someone called you an asshole would help. Not being Bill Schmalfeldt would help. LikeLiked by 6 people Reply ↓
He’s still stuck wit dat fatal flaw that he can’t fix: “Now comes plaintiff William M. Schmaleldtt, Sr.” The M stands for DUMBFUCK! LikeLiked by 3 people Reply ↓
He also said that he didn’t have copies of his old posts, but we all know how THAT turned out. I’m sure that’s not going come back to bite him … at all. Now, do I really need the tag there? LikeLiked by 2 people Reply ↓
Ack. Silly brain. between the and tag, there should be a /sarc tacked in there. LikeLiked by 2 people Reply ↓
The FAT Deranged Cyberstalker Bill Schmalfeldt wrote: “Evidence or insults from anonymous (for now) cowards?” For now? *yaaaaawn* Maybe Howard or Krendler or, or, or, or, or… would like to weigh in. But, then again… what do I know? I am just a leftist San Francisco hairdresser AKA Jeanette Runyon AKA a HZIC sock AKA a Louisiana midwife on the lam AKA… blah, blah, blah… Bring it, Blob. 😂 LikeLiked by 1 person Reply ↓
Being able to show up in court. That appears to be a problem for this particular plaintiff.
LikeLiked by 7 people
Even with ADA accessibility.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Being a cripple! Or so I’ve heard.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Learning the rules of the court? I don’t think that’s too much education, since he’s already heard it from one judge.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Rules only apply when he’s the Judge. That’s why he wins all the time on Twitter Court.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Actually making it past the Motion to Dismiss stage…to boldly go where no Schmalballz has gone before…at least as a plaintiff…
LikeLiked by 5 people
Actual torts would help a civil case.
Being the resident of the state you’re suing in, at the time you allege the torts happened, would help.
Not being a pissant and suing because someone called you an asshole would help.
Not being Bill Schmalfeldt would help.
LikeLiked by 6 people
“Not being Bill Schmalfeldt would help.”
That one really is key.
LikeLiked by 5 people
He’s still stuck wit dat fatal flaw that he can’t fix:
“Now comes plaintiff William M. Schmaleldtt, Sr.”
The M stands for DUMBFUCK!
LikeLiked by 3 people
He said he didn’t have any evidence …
LikeLiked by 2 people
He also said that he didn’t have copies of his old posts, but we all know how THAT turned out. I’m sure that’s not going come back to bite him … at all.
Now, do I really need the tag there?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ack. Silly brain. between the and tag, there should be a /sarc tacked in there.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The FAT Deranged Cyberstalker Bill Schmalfeldt wrote:
“Evidence or insults from anonymous (for now) cowards?”
For now? *yaaaaawn*
Maybe Howard or Krendler or, or, or, or, or… would like to weigh in.
But, then again… what do I know?
I am just a leftist San Francisco hairdresser AKA Jeanette Runyon AKA a HZIC sock AKA a Louisiana midwife on the lam AKA… blah, blah, blah…
Bring it, Blob. 😂
LikeLiked by 1 person