So this happened..

Posted on by

jwbe6m7Bill really wants to talk with me.  He wants me to come on his show and talk about me and how much trouble I’m in.  He thinks that if he can get me to talk, we can settle all this nonsense, especially since he has my real name and address, and that alone is enough for me to “sing like a birdy!”

No really, I’m going to sing to a deadbeat and his woman living in a South Carolina motel.

One thing Bill likes to do is get legal opinions from his adversaries, hoping they will get into an argument with him.  And when they respond, he will say things like this:

https://twitter.com/breitbitnews/status/877567948902236160

Really?  You’re speaking for a judge now?

For those just joining this opera, Bill has spent a lot more time in a courtroom as a defendant than as a plaintiff.  Has he ever been a plaintiff in a courtroom?  What makes him think that a defendant will have to answer to a judge?

Just because he’s had to answer for peace orders and show cause orders because of his fuckups doesn’t mean I am going to do the same when it’s my turn.

And usually, the Judge talks to the lawyer, anyway, which will most likely (if it ever comes to that) happen.

Anyway, I guess there will be a summons issued for me.  How long should I wait?

Edit:  I should mention, out of fairness, that Bill has won every case he’s tried in Twitter court.  Every. Single. One.  Think about that.

Edit #2: He’s now on Twitter trying his case against me.   He’s sharing all his evidence..like.. on the internet.  No, really.   I’m sure the verdict will come any moment.

https://twitter.com/breitbitnews/status/877594644930056196

https://twitter.com/breitbitnews/status/877596469364113409

16 thoughts on “So this happened..”

  3. Shot:

    “And since we have no further business until the issuing of summonses, no sense in continuing this conversation.”

    Chaser:

    “Oh, I’m sure he will have a perfectly good explanation for these. But then…”

    He couldn’t hold it in for 2 stinking hours. Now: “Twitter court is in session!”

    Anybody notice how fat Bill is?

    Liked by 6 people

    Reply ↓

  5. because questioning the physical health of someone who has claimed to be DYING!!!11! of a progressive neurological disease that never gets better, after they show significant improvement in their health, such as being able to care for themselves, drive and even move several times, AFTER declaring they are completely unable to do those things, is libel…

    but declaring someone is a child rapist when you knew they were not to “con” them into revealing information isn’t….

    yeah when this gets in front of a judge, I don’t think MJ will be the defendant.
    Just saying.

    Liked by 5 people

    Reply ↓

    • I agree, Roy.

      If Dumbfuck McMoobfunk tried that “jefe” bullshit in the barrio, there wouldn’t be enough left of him to ship home to the inflataskank.

      Liked by 3 people

      Reply ↓

  6. Having the opinion that Bill Schmalfeldt faked his way to a PD diagnosis, and disability check, isn’t libel, nor is it defamation, etc. It’s a reasonable conclusion based on the information Schmalfeldt put out. He told us over and over that PD is a progressive disorder, that it only gets worse over time, and that the deterioration of a PD sufferer’s condition is irreversible.
    He told us he couldn’t drive due to PD. He told us he couldn’t travel unassisted, due to PD. He told us he needed a walker to get around at all, due to PD.
    Then, he got a new license and a shitty old car. He started driving long distances, all by himself. He posted multiple pics of himself out and about, no rolly-walker in sight.

    You don’t have PD, dumbfuck. You proved it yourself.

    Liked by 5 people

    Reply ↓

    • Hypothetically speaking, Bill has a problem with his announced prosecution based on the evidence he has.

      The timeline of events as established by his own words and documented activity freely of his own will, are extremely contradictory. In fact, the issue he has here is how to square his words against experts that most assuredly will be called in. If he has any medical records or documentation in his possession, they would be subject to discovery for review by hired experts. If he doesn’t, those same experts can be used to call into question his credibility, not that it wouldn’t already be in question.

      Let’s just say, he is his own worst enemy.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply ↓

      • I guess if you wanted to, you could go the route of actually trying the case in order to pursue a counter-claim. He definitely fed you that, via defamation per se. He asserted that you were a person who had sexually assaulted two children and been convicted of same, and that he knew this due to a purchased background check. That’s even worse than his defamation of Hoge, as there he asserted Osborne’s story was true, but gave no reason he would know one way or another. The stumbling block, for me anyway, is the investment of time and money and the small prospect of a decent ROI. But as you know, I’m as literally a mercenary as you’re ever likely to meet, and that’s how I assess these things.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply ↓

  7. And what’s really awesome, AJ, is that the disability letter that BEETUSJUICE BUTTERBUTT just posted ALSO does not say that he has Parkinson’s disease.

    In fact, if one understands a lick of government-speak, what that letter says is “less than a year after we hired him, we figured out he couldn’t do the job. We took all the required bureacratic HR measures, and now it’s time to fire his fat ass. But rather than fight, he wants a disability retirement. Nobody but him actually will say he has ‘Parkinson’s disease,’ (which should be an indicator, wink, wink) but everybody wants to be rid of him. In the best interests of everyone, let’s just do it with a minimum of fuss and expense.”

    Liked by 5 people

    Reply ↓

Leave a comment